vs. cohort treatment
Solutions · VIP management
Your VIP team handles 30 players. Canon handles the next 3,000.
Most operators have a long tail of high-value players that don't quite qualify for personal management — and get cohort treatment instead. Canon gives them per-player decisions without per-player headcount.
Today
The VIP gap is structural.
Your team can manage 30–50 named VIPs. Players ranked 50–3000 are 'segment 2' — they get the cohort treatment.
Sub-VIPs get the same 'high-value player' bonus the actual VIPs decline. The bonus isn't sized to them.
Long-tail VIPs are where bonus abuse, RG escalations, and churn cluster — exactly the players cohort treatment misses.
With Canon
Per-player VIP treatment, applied to your long tail.
Each long-tail VIP gets a decision shaped by their elasticity, lifecycle, and risk — not the cohort average.
Pin policies for specific players, exclude others, set spend caps and frequency by VIP tier.
Long-tail VIPs are where RG risk concentrates. Canon flags loss-chasing, escalation, and session-length issues to your team.
When a player crosses a threshold (revenue, risk, intent signal), Canon escalates to a named VIP manager rather than handling autonomously.
What the long tail looks like with Canon.
without adding VIP headcount
vs. cohort baseline
“We always knew the long-tail VIPs were our biggest leak. Canon was the first thing that gave us per-player treatment without hiring a second VIP team.”
See per-player VIP on a slice of your tail.
A 60-day pilot on the 1,000 players your VIP team can't reach. Holdout-measured.